Meeting recording & transcripts
grain.com
Test against the Grain API
A hosted, stateful simulation shaped like the Grain API. Writes persist, data moves on a schedule and every change can fire a signed webhook. Unofficial: not affiliated with grain.com.
- Operations
- 13
example request
curl https://your-grain.slurry.io/_/public-api/v2/token-info \
-H "Authorization: Bearer slurry_sim_live_..."Your simulation gets its own hostname, key and IP allow-list. Spec snapshot: version 2026-10-01.
What gets simulated
Collections, relationships and state machines are worked out from the spec when you start the simulation.
- State. Creates, updates and deletes persist and show up in later reads.
- Behaviour. Records move through their states on a schedule you control, and you can fast-forward up to 30 days.
- Webhooks. Every change emits a signed, retried event.
- Failure. Per-endpoint errors, latency and chaos rules, on demand.
Operations
First 12 of 13.
- POST/_/public-api/v2/recordings
- POST/_/public-api/v2/recordings/{recording_id}
- PATCH/_/public-api/v2/recordings/{recording_id}
- GET/_/public-api/v2/recordings/{recording_id}/transcript
- GET/_/public-api/v2/recordings/{recording_id}/transcript.vtt
- GET/_/public-api/v2/recordings/{recording_id}/transcript.txt
- POST/_/public-api/v2/teams
- POST/_/public-api/v2/meeting_types
- POST/_/public-api/v2/users
- POST/_/public-api/v2/hooks
- POST/_/public-api/v2/hooks/create
- DELETE/_/public-api/v2/hooks/{hook_id}
Does this simulation differ from the real Grain API?
Tell us about wrong response shapes, status codes, missing endpoints or unrealistic data. If you have a simulation of it, report from its Issues tab so we can see the exact call.